[apparmor] Where should the new aa-exec live in packaging

[Seth Arnold]

On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 09:26:43AM -0700, John Johansen wrote:
> So we have a binary (C based) version of aa-exec that just needs a little
> more revision before we land it. One of the things we need to decide is
> which package to put it in.
> 
> We could modify the utils packaging to handle binary and no arch, create
> a new package for binary utils, or just move it into the apparmor_parser
> packaging, and make it part of the default install.
> 
> What are peoples preferences for this

It's tiny and adds no new dependencies: parser packge feels fair.

Thanks
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/apparmor/attachments/20130724/a4a781f9/attachment-0001.pgp>