Testers - your feedback.
pasi at shimmerproject.org
Fri May 23 07:44:20 UTC 2014
On 23/05/14 10:06, Elfy wrote:
> On 21/05/14 20:32, Jack Fromm wrote:
>>> Ideas on changes to testcases ? You've been reading and using them
>>> for almost 2 cycles now.
>> I think for the most part they've been tweaked pretty well and cover
>> most of what needs to be tested without going overboard. The only
>> suggestion I would have for improvement would be a minor one about
>> the formatting. There doesn't appear to be a standardized convention
>> for differentiating between menu choices, buttons and check boxes and
>> keyboard input required from the tester, etc. Maybe the xml format
>> is too limited for making things better, but it can be hard to follow
>> some of the testcases at a glance.
> I don't know enough about that to make a sensible comment. Other than
> - can you be more specific about a particular testcase - I might be
> able to look at that then
We can add new (micro)formats as needed.
However, we are currently relying only on pure HTML markup, which is a
big plus. Introducing any classes or such should be well thought out and
useful, since it adds to the testcase markup and makes it a bit less
legible. This is not a huge problem, but we don't want to make
reading/writing the testcases any more complex than it is now if the
benefit is only minor. I can agree some classes might be worth the while
We should probably coordinate this effort through the QA team so
everybody can be planning and benefit of it. I've just subscribed the
-quality mailing list , so we can take it there or #ubuntu-quality on
Pasi Lallinaho (knome) » http://open.knome.fi/
Leader of the Shimmer Project » http://shimmerproject.org/
Ubuntu member, Xubuntu team member » http://xubuntu.org/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the xubuntu-devel