jozmak at gmail.com
Mon Aug 4 17:29:22 UTC 2008
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 4:09 PM, Vincent <mailinglists at vinnl.nl> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 5:57 PM, jmak <jozmak at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Vincent <mailinglists at vinnl.nl> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 5:01 PM, jmak <jozmak at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> I agree with you. I am also running dreamlinux, in fact that is the
>> >> only distro that I didn't feel the need to change its defaults
>> >> setting.
>> >> This just shows what I said before; how important the look is. And how
>> >> important to understand the target audience preferences.
>> >> By the way, AWN developers are working on a standalone launcher that
>> >> works without compiz. Maybe, we can already start thinking about
>> >> replacing xubuntu's bottom panel in the upcoming releases with AWN
>> >> launcher.
>> > Bad idea, AWN isn't great in terms of usability. It leaves the two
>> > bottom
>> > corners, which are easiest to reach with the mouse (together with the
>> > top
>> > corners) unused. Besides, AWN takes up quite a lot of vertical space
>> > while
>> > we will still also need a top panel for the menu and such.
>> Dreamlinux uses the similar set up but with engage. I find it
>> extremely usable.
> Well, it's a fact that the corners are the easiest to reach, so it's a waste
> not to use it.
>> Because engage is sitting behind the applications
>> only one panel visible, that even optimizes screenspace.
> Having the icons behind the applications is really not that handy, see
> The margin at the bottom is distracting and meanwhile the dock is unusable.
>> I like the
>> idea that the systemtray and the menu is on the same panel.
> That already is the case in Xubuntu IIRC.
>> And in the
>> next awn release, you will be able position the launchers any side of
>> the screen.
>> In the last sentence, you meant its size? It is too large that's what you
> Yep, if it doesn't hide behind windows then it takes up a lot of screen real
> estate (with a lot wasted at both sides of the dock), which doesn't sound
> like a good idea after all the discussion on decreasing the panel size.
>> >> Even Mark Suttleworth indicated, it is possible that in the future kde
>> >> will be the main ubuntu desktop rather than gnome.
>> > No he didn't. He said that an LGPL Qt might be the basis of GNOME
>> > instead of
>> > GTK - with an emphasis on *might*, because clearly that would be a lot
>> > of
>> > work. Besides, GTK is also still improving.
>> I was not sure exactly the wording; but now he starts talking about
>> the beauty of the macintosh and the fact that ubuntu has to look even
>> better, indicates that when kde 4 will be fully functional he might
>> make kde as a main ubuntu desktop.
> Can you cite a source? I'm quite up-to-date yet can't recall reading
> anything of the sorts. I do know he wants to out-pretty OS X, but no mention
> of using KDE to accomplish that. (Probably the most important step to
> accomplish that is a different colour scheme ;-)
Oh the source. I cannot remember where i read it; I think it was in an
interview. I wish I would have saved it. But the tendency is that Mark
gradually warms up to the idea that kde is the way to go. Eventually
he will realize that with the brown image of ubuntu he wont be able to
break into the mainstream.
More information about the xubuntu-devel