Poll for GNOME dependencies

Adam Miller maxamillion at gmail.com
Thu Aug 9 21:57:56 UTC 2007

Nope, I've been complaining about gnome-libs since day 1 but I do understand
and respect why logically and for all practical purposes they are sometimes
unavoidable. One of the reasons I believe they can not be avoided is simply
because we lack developers, to my knowledge we now have 2 core devs working
on Xubuntu which is not many and therefore they need to devote their time to
things of priority such as stability of the distro as a whole and not so
much re-inventing the wheel so that its lighter and faster. Don't get me
wrong, I am all for light and fast but sometimes it is just not logical.


On 8/9/07, Giuseppe Torelli <colossus73 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8/9/07, Giuseppe Torelli <colossus73 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Are you favorable to ship Gutsy with GNOME dependencies?
> --
> Colossus
> Xarchiver, a Linux GTK+2 only archive manager - http://xarchiver.xfce.org
> --
> xubuntu-devel mailing list
> xubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel

()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/xubuntu-devel/attachments/20070809/e922e4e4/attachment.html>

More information about the xubuntu-devel mailing list