GNOME dependencies

Giuseppe Torelli colossus73 at
Thu Aug 9 16:57:03 UTC 2007

On 8/9/07, Jani Monoses <jani.monoses at> wrote:
> Maintenance is reflected by responsiveness to bugs and releases. having something in svn trunk means you are not
> comfortable with it's release quality so it cannot help xubuntu at this point.

I don't understand this statement. I need svn for version control and
to let others collaborate with the development.

> The fact that you choose to work on Xhep instead of fixing xarchiver bugs - while it is your right to do so obviously
> - shows you are not actively maintaining it.

???? Come on Jani. I'm coding both of them in my spare time.

> We have to find the right balance and zealotry, hatred of GNOME (or whatever) or personal agendas should not play a role here.
> Not implying anyone is hating GNONE or has such agendas, but the criteria need to be technical and adapted to user requirements.

I don't hate gnome. I hate gnome developer's attitude. That's different.

> By definition that cannot be true. Even if in theory (won't happen) we only switch out the core (panel, file manager, settings, desktop)
> Xfce already is smaller. So please do not state clearly untrue facts.

Jani, gnome is a burdern, it eats lot of memory, this is a true fact.

> right, known issue, no time to fix it in feisty updates :( . Is is being fixed in gutsy but that does not help most people.


Without ANY resentment,


Xarchiver, a Linux GTK+2 only archive manager -

More information about the xubuntu-devel mailing list