utmp handing (Was: [RFC][PATCH] Add support for oom_score_adj)

Scott James Remnant scott at netsplit.com
Mon Mar 21 15:07:42 UTC 2011


What is the unmerged part, OOI? I thought I had taken all your
changes, but it seems not.

Scott

On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Petr Lautrbach <plautrba at redhat.com> wrote:
> On 03/18/2011 11:09 PM, Scott James Remnant wrote:
>>
>> Cc'ing Petr
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Marc - A. Dahlhaus<mad at wol.de>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 17.03.2011 21:45, schrieb Scott James Remnant:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Marc - A. Dahlhaus<mad at wol.de>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> BTW is the override file stuff upstreamed into the 1.X branch already?
>>>>>
>>>> No. I wanted to release a stable 1.0 with no new features, James
>>>> needed to get features in for Ubuntu natty - so for now Ubuntu is
>>>> running a fork of Upstart (whichout all the bug fixes of 1.0 + 1.1,
>>>> but with new features).
>>>
>>> while we are at it, i had some problems regarding utmp handling in 1.0
>>> and
>>> while running a gdb session and talking with plauterbach on irc he
>>> suggested
>>> adding this patch: http://plautrba.fedorapeople.org/upstart-utmp.patch
>>>
>>> The patch fixed the utmp handling on my box which is running an LFS based
>>> system with unpatched upstream versions of glibc-2.13, util-linux-2.19
>>> (agetty) and shadow-4.1.4.3 (login).
>>>
>>> The problem was that upstart couldn't find the first opened utmp record
>>> on
>>> logout from local ttys for each tty after a clean boot. The behavior was
>>> the
>>> same even on a empty utmp file after a boot. SSH ttys where handled
>>> correctly
>>> so a buggy glibc was ruled out in our tests.
>>>
>>> I didn't debugged it further after i found out that the patch mentioned
>>> above
>>> fixed the bug for me.
>>>
>> Yeah, after reviewing some merges I think I managed not to get the
>> entirety of those patches.
>>
>> Petr - what am I missing?
>>
>
> Really don't know.
>
> From my point of view, merged changes do work fine for me regardless on
> non-pushed part.
> I will try to reproduce it with latest util-linux and clear upstart-1.1
> sources without any fedora patches but
> since I've already tried few things and everything's went as expected ...
>
> Regards,
>
> Petr
> --
> Petr Lautrbach, Red Hat, Inc.
>



More information about the upstart-devel mailing list