utmp handing (Was: [RFC][PATCH] Add support for oom_score_adj)

[Petr Lautrbach]

On 03/21/2011 04:07 PM, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> What is the unmerged part, OOI? I thought I had taken all your
> changes, but it seems not.
>
> Scott

this email's [1] 3rd attachment [2]


[1] https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/upstart-devel/2011-January/001363.html
[2]https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/upstart-devel/attachments/20110105/ab27f4e9/attachment-0002.ksh

Petr

>
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Petr Lautrbach<plautrba at redhat.com>  wrote:
>> On 03/18/2011 11:09 PM, Scott James Remnant wrote:
>>>
>>> Cc'ing Petr
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Marc - A. Dahlhaus<mad at wol.de>    wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Am 17.03.2011 21:45, schrieb Scott James Remnant:
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Marc - A. Dahlhaus<mad at wol.de>    wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> BTW is the override file stuff upstreamed into the 1.X branch already?
>>>>>>
>>>>> No. I wanted to release a stable 1.0 with no new features, James
>>>>> needed to get features in for Ubuntu natty - so for now Ubuntu is
>>>>> running a fork of Upstart (whichout all the bug fixes of 1.0 + 1.1,
>>>>> but with new features).
>>>>
>>>> while we are at it, i had some problems regarding utmp handling in 1.0
>>>> and
>>>> while running a gdb session and talking with plauterbach on irc he
>>>> suggested
>>>> adding this patch: http://plautrba.fedorapeople.org/upstart-utmp.patch
>>>>
>>>> The patch fixed the utmp handling on my box which is running an LFS based
>>>> system with unpatched upstream versions of glibc-2.13, util-linux-2.19
>>>> (agetty) and shadow-4.1.4.3 (login).
>>>>
>>>> The problem was that upstart couldn't find the first opened utmp record
>>>> on
>>>> logout from local ttys for each tty after a clean boot. The behavior was
>>>> the
>>>> same even on a empty utmp file after a boot. SSH ttys where handled
>>>> correctly
>>>> so a buggy glibc was ruled out in our tests.
>>>>
>>>> I didn't debugged it further after i found out that the patch mentioned
>>>> above
>>>> fixed the bug for me.
>>>>
>>> Yeah, after reviewing some merges I think I managed not to get the
>>> entirety of those patches.
>>>
>>> Petr - what am I missing?
>>>
>>
>> Really don't know.
>>
>>  From my point of view, merged changes do work fine for me regardless on
>> non-pushed part.
>> I will try to reproduce it with latest util-linux and clear upstart-1.1
>> sources without any fedora patches but
>> since I've already tried few things and everything's went as expected ...
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Petr
>> --
>> Petr Lautrbach, Red Hat, Inc.
>>


-- 
Petr Lautrbach, Red Hat, Inc.