Compile from srource

[Grail Dane]

Oops ... sorry Scott, didn't realise I wasn't replying to list before :(
Hi Guys
Thanks for the replies. Just to confirm, I am building an entirely upstart dependantdistro (so no initial references to old init or /etc/init.d stuff), so should I be linkingstatically or dynamically? ( I am leading toward the latter)
CheersGrail
> Subject: Re: Compile from srource
> From: scott at netsplit.com
> To: mbiebl at gmail.com
> CC: grail69 at hotmail.com; upstart-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 15:56:21 +0000
> 
> On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 16:45 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> 
> > 2010/3/1 Scott James Remnant <scott at netsplit.com>:
> > >
> > >        bzr branch lp:upstart
> > >        cd upstart
> > >        autoreconf -i
> > >        ./configure --with-local-libnih=../libnih
> > >        make
> > 
> > This will link upstart dynamically against libnih though, i.e. you
> > will also need to install libnih to /lib
> This is intended for when you're not actually installing, you can run
> init out of Upstart's source tree and it'll be linked to the
> non-installed libnih
> 
> But yes, this will link to libnih as a dynamic library, so should you
> run "make install" you'll have to do the same in the other.
> 
> You can link statically with just:
> 
> 	./configure --with-local-libnih=../libnih --disable-shared
> 
> > So it does not quite behave as the old nihify script. 
> > 
> It's not intended to.
> 
> Scott
> -- 
> Have you ever, ever felt like this?
> Had strange things happen?  Are you going round the twist?
 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
View photos of singles in your area! Browse profiles for FREE
http://clk.atdmt.com/NMN/go/150855801/direct/01/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/upstart-devel/attachments/20100302/cfa73967/attachment-0001.htm