User Survey

[martin f krafft]

also sprach Marco d'Itri <md at Linux.IT> [2006.09.02.1945 +0200]:
> > Is there a better model of development you can suggest that would it
> > make it easier for it to be packaged in Debian?
> Create unofficial sysvutils packages until the Debian maintainer will
> properly split it.

That's one way, but I'd only go down this route if I knew the
maintainer wants to do it but cannot find the time soon. In which
case... it's not like it's going to be a hard NMU. :)

I'd hate to see through the migration of a binary package from one
source to another. It's just not what I draw pleasure from.

-- 
martin;              (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
  \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:" net at madduck
 
spamtraps: madduck.bogus at madduck.net
 
the best way to accelerate
a computer running windoze
is at 9.81 ms^-2
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/upstart-devel/attachments/20060903/7e5f97db/attachment.pgp