[UbuntuWomen] Channel names/logging

[Leigh Honeywell]

+1 on this.  it's easier to move the little bit of project-specific talk
to the -project channel than the extensive social chatter to a different
channel.

-leigh

On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 06:35:33PM -0500, idleone wrote:
> I agree that -women should remain as is, changing the scope of the
> channel now would be IMHO ridiculous. 
> 
> -women-project would be a good name for a the logged channel. I think it
> explains exactly what the channel is about.
> 
> John "IdleOne" Chiazzese
> 
> On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 00:25 +0200, Miia Ranta wrote:
> > in IRC, since times eternal, it has been an _exception_ to log a
> > channel publically. of course you can inform in topic or entrymsg that
> > the channel is publically logged - but let's be honest to ourselves -
> > they are more often ignored than read.
> > 
> > In the benefit of keeping the current channel social without further
> > loss of privacy of unwary visitors, my opinion is that -women should
> > be the social, unlogged, and the new channel, say, -womeen-project
> > publically logged.
> > 
> > -- 
> > Miia "Myrtti" Ranta
> > -- 
> > GCS/ED/FA/H/P/S/L/O d- s-:+ a29 C++ UL+ P+ L+++ E W+++ N+ o K+ w+(---)
> > !O M V? PS++ PE>$ Y+ PGP- t+ 5+++ X+ R tv- b+++ DI++++ D-- G e>+++ h-
> > r++ x?
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Ubuntu-Women mailing list
> Ubuntu-Women at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-women