[UbuntuWomen] Results from the IRC Purpose Poll

[Amber Graner]

On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 10:49 AM, || स्वक्ष || vid <vid at svaksha.com> wrote:
> Hello Folks,
>
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 10:13, Amber Graner <akgraner at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> The Option that was chosen was Option 3.
>
> yay :)
>
>
>> Thank you all so much for voting.  It is nice to see more and more of
>> the team becoming involved in these process and meetings.
>
> ... the team has always pitched in, when asked! :)
>
> At the risk of going on a tangent, would you be posting the logs of
> yesterdays IRC discussion to the list and forums, considering that the
> "log channel" votes came in today.

Not to be short but, No the logs from yesterday's discussion will not
be made available as not everyone involved in the discussion did not
give their consent.  Also it has not been determined if the current
channel will remain unlogged or become the logged on.  However I have
another email that will be sent to the list on the discussion of
process.
>
>
>> I look forward to suggestions on the naming of the 2nd Channel and
>
> here are some suggestions (with or without the hyphen):
>
> 0. uw-social,
> 1. uw-nologs,
> 2. uw-talk,
> 3. uw-chat, (sounds a bit cheesy but for the sake of exploring alternatives...)
> 4. uw-discuss,
> 5. uw-all, (as in, all are welcome)
>
> I could go on but let me leave something for others too:)
>

Great suggestions!

Amber

> Thanks,
> --
> || vid | http://svaksha.com ||
>
> --
> Ubuntu-Women mailing list
> Ubuntu-Women at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-women
>



-- 
Amber Graner//akgraner//
http://amber.redvoodoo.org/
http://www.ubuntu-user.com/Online/Blogs/Amber-Graner-You-in-Ubuntu


Just me Amber.

There are lots of Linux users who don't care how the kernel works, but
only want to use it. That is a tribute to how good Linux is.
Linus Torvalds