Can a package be returned to a previous version

[Liam Proven]

On 04/10/2023 1:33 pm, Little Girl wrote:
wn.
> 
> That was uncalled-for, Liam. Bret should be able to see senders' and
> recipients' email addresses and if those aren't visible, there's an
> issue that needs attention.
> 

No, it really isn't. For an example, I just searched my Ubuntu-users 
folder for the word "sabotage", a word that Bret has used a lot in the 
past, and found a dozen threads started him where he accuses the Ubuntu 
maintainers of deliberately putting spyware into the OS and otherwise 
breaking it.


Mon, 16 Oct 2017, 23:52: Software updater snuck in a package that is 
unwanted


Wed, 21 Nov 2018, 10:34: The apparent rabid malware named wnck-applet


Fri, 18 Jun 2021, 17:38: System update corrupted system

Etc. etc.

I have been on this list for 13 years now, and most of the claims of 
intentional OS breakage have been from Bret.

Now, right now, I am replying to the list from Thunderbird, beta version 
118, so newer than 115.


It says your mail is from, verbatim:

Little Girl <littlergirl at gmail.com>

Both name and email address showing in full. Nothing hidden.

My reply is shown as going to:

ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com

I don't have a short name for it in my address book, but that's the full 
correct email address.

It's not doing what Bret says it's doing.

Now, to be fair, I am typing on an iMac running macOS 12 "Monterey" but 
it's the same email client.  I also have it on Windows and Ubuntu. It 
has not hidden anything from me that I have seen, anywhere.


-- 
Liam Proven - Profile: https://about.me/liamproven
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk - Google Mail/Hangouts/Plus: lproven at gmail.com
Twitter/Facebook/Flickr: lproven - Skype/LinkedIn: liamproven
IoM: +44 7624 227612 ~ UK: +44 7939-087884
ČR (+ WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal): +420 702 829 053