Ubuntu server holding back on me

Liam Proven lproven at gmail.com
Fri Sep 22 11:36:06 UTC 2017


On 22 September 2017 at 11:54, Oliver Grawert <ogra at ubuntu.com> wrote:
>
> nope, full-upgrade means "additionally allow removal of packages (even
> if they are essential)" while the newly merged "upgrade" command simply
> makes sure there are no held back packages during the upgrade process
> itself.

Yup, that is pretty much what I understood the difference to be and
what I meant.

If we are just talking about ordinary desktop installs here, and you
want the thing as current as possible and are not worried about
specific versions of specific packages -- which is, I submit, the
likely default condition for a typical desktop/laptop -- then what I
suggest is ``full-upgrade''.

If one were being much more cautious, e.g. on an important server or
something, fair enough -- but then, if that's the case, one is
probably not asking newb-type questions on a support list, right?

-- 
Liam Proven • Profile: https://about.me/liamproven
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk • Google Mail/Talk/Plus: lproven at gmail.com
Twitter/Facebook/Flickr: lproven • Skype/LinkedIn/AIM/Yahoo: liamproven
UK: +44 7939-087884 • ČR/WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal: +420 702 829 053




More information about the ubuntu-users mailing list