Why do all the sudo? [was Re: Software updater no longer functional]
Chris Green
cl at isbd.net
Mon Jan 23 10:38:09 UTC 2017
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 11:16:21AM +0100, iceblink wrote:
> On 2017-01-23 07:38, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > > On 23 Jan 2017, at 07:34, Karl Auer <kauer at biplane.com.au> wrote:
> > >
> > > It's safer for experienced people too.
> >
> > Why is sudo safer?
> >
> > I explained why it isn't safer, so please explain were I'm mistaken.
>
> Real life example: I worked as a consultant for a company where the unix
> admin worked as root, always.
> Because he was experienced. Or something.
>
My original comment (that started this thread) was *NOT* about always
using root, it was simply saying that (for example) :-
sudo -i
apt-get update
apt-get upgrade
apt-get install <something>
apt-get autoremove
apt-get clean
exit
is somewhat tidier *and* easier to understand than:-
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get upgrade
sudo apt-get install <something>
sudo apt-get autoremove
sudo apt-get clean
If you were to use synaptic to do the same job then it does exactly
what I am suggesting, you become root for the duration of the job and
exit when you've finished.
--
Chris Green
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list