list at xenhideout.nl
Sun Dec 3 07:01:36 UTC 2017
Ralf Mardorf schreef op 02-12-2017 20:59:
> Thank you Adam,
> let alone that at least some users aren't aware that there is a
> difference between deleting (removing) a file and shredding it, on what
> ever shred level. Regarding digital forensics the "deepness" how the
> file is shred could matter a lot, too.
You are creating fear for no reason and you are misinforming people on
Instead of inticing anxiety, why don't you inform?
- The default operation of "shred" is indeed not to delete. This is
because shred can also be used on device files, and you would not want
to delete a device file -- although "shred" could of course be clever
enough to detect this.
To delete one must supply the -u flag.
By default, "shred" shreds to a sufficient enough "deepness" to thwart
even physical assailants who have access to low-level technologies (that
they need to take your device apart for).
However, in the typical use case, this is no concern. But it requires
additional options (-n0 -z) to shred only one time, and with zeroes.
As such, as long as you are aware of the -u flag to actually delete,
there is no reason not to use shred on an ext3/ext4 filesystem.
And you should not misinform people.
More information about the ubuntu-users