lproven at gmail.com
Sat Oct 10 14:45:12 UTC 2015
On 9 October 2015 at 19:28, Bret Busby <bret.busby at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 09/10/2015, Liam Proven <lproven at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 8 October 2015 at 19:32, Bret Busby <bret.busby at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Would that, pechance, mean that 15.04 would be supported until (after)
>>> 16.04 (being the next LTS version) is released?
>> I have no idea what you mean.
> With what I had posted, being taken out of context, by the omission
> above, of the material regarding which, my post related, I am not
> surprised that it is not clear what my query meant.
> It is very much like someone asking a yes/no question, a person
> replying, with both the question, and the answer 'yes", and then
> someone else posting a response without including the question, and
> then saying "I have no idea, to what you are saying "yes" ".
> It is a common problem that arises when people cut too much out of a
> message to which they are responding, so that everything loses its
No, it was not about context.
I do not understand what you felt could mean that 15.04 -- or any
other version -- would be supported after the following LTS release.
Normal Ubuntu releases get 9mth support. That's all. Nothing has
changed. Half way through the life cycle of the following short-term
release, they go out of support.
This is to stop people using the release until the one /two/ after
comes out and then hoping to upgrade directly.
Nothing anywhere has even hinted to anything else, AFAICS, and
therefore I did not understand why you were asking.
Liam Proven • Profile: http://lproven.livejournal.com/profile
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk • GMail/G+/Twitter/Flickr/Facebook: lproven
MSN: lproven at hotmail.com • Skype/AIM/Yahoo/LinkedIn: liamproven
Cell/Mobiles: +44 7939-087884 (UK) • +420 702 829 053 (ČR)
More information about the ubuntu-users