Quwery about firewall software
kauer at biplane.com.au
Sun Nov 15 22:08:43 UTC 2015
On Sun, 2015-11-15 at 14:42 -0700, compdoc wrote:
> Some people have been using the internet long enough to know something about
> consumer gear.
Indeed. I've been doing it since 1992, including thirteen years in
network management, supporting thousands of users of consumer gear.
Yes, lots of consumer gear dies. So do general purpose computers. It is
cheaper, faster, and simpler to replace consumer gear. So use it when
In an enterprise situation, where you have complex requirements and
staff to set things up and maintain them, roll-you-own solutions mate be
appropriate. Even then, however, an appliance is generally a much better
idea. There's a reason Cisco, Juniper et al have a market.
For the home user or small business owner - even the skilled home user
or business owner - an appliance is almost certainly the right way to
> Sure, there are exceptions and MikroTik has been around a long time, and
> they produce great gear and code. I wouldn't call them 'consumer' grade.
No - they are better. But the COST the same as consumer grade stuff.
They are even at the low end of that cost range.
> They have a great set of features. But no antivirus, or Intrusion
> detection/prevention, or country block functions.
As I believe I said, if there are pfSense features you want, use
> MikroTik does provide great support, which is a valuable thing to some.
Really? In my experience their support absolutely sucks. Glad yours
As I said, perhaps we should agree to disagree,
Karl Auer (kauer at biplane.com.au)
GPG fingerprint: 3C41 82BE A9E7 99A1 B931 5AE7 7638 0147 2C3C 2AC4
Old fingerprint: EC67 61E2 C2F6 EB55 884B E129 072B 0AF0 72AA 9882
More information about the ubuntu-users