port 5060, was Re: [OT] router ports & DMZ

[Colin Law]

On 18 February 2015 at 06:37, thufir <hawat.thufir at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 17:52:12 +0000, Colin Law wrote:
>
>
>> If they are all 192.168.1.x then they are all on the same subnet and
>> should be able to communicate directly without any port forwarding. But
>> a few lines earlier you said that tleilax is 192.168.2 but I assume you
>> mean 192.168.1.2
>
> Sorry, yes; exactly.
>
> Hmm, so what you're saying, and Patrick said it as well:
>
> "The router only closes ports from WAN to LAN."
>
>
> Because they're all onn the same subnet, port forwarding shouldn't be an
> issue; all the ports should be open.  Is it possible to confirm that with
> nmap?  I'm googling on that.

If you want to check the ports open on 192.168.1.nnn just use
nmap 192.168.1.nnn
from the machine that you want to access it from.

Colin


>
> If it's not the router, then I'm somewhat at a loss.  I'll start a
> different thread on SIP then. I might install Asterisk locally.
>
>
> Thufir
>
>
> --
> ubuntu-users mailing list
> ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users