Btrfs on top of LVM?

[J.Witvliet at mindef.nl]

Be sure to have enough mem
I found that for every btrfs-mount, i got some extra processes
Currently i have over 60 btrfs-mounts, all on their own LVM


Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone

> Op 22 aug. 2015 om 18:52 heeft Petter Adsen <petter at synth.no> het volgende geschreven:
> 
> Has anyone here used btrfs on top of LVM? Are there any problems or
> gotchas I should be aware of?
> 
> I want to use a logical volume to receive a btrfs subvolume and
> incremental snapshots to test it out as a possible backup solution for
> a smallish (500GB) filesystem that has a fair amount of changes in a
> day.
> 
> Ideally I would use a separate disk, but right now I need to do this on
> top of an LV if possible. Performance is not an issue. And no, this
> will not be my only backup :)
> 
> Any advice and experiences would be welcome.
> 
> Petter
> 
> -- 
> "I'm ionized"
> "Are you sure?"
> "I'm positive."
> 
> <OpenPGP digital signature.attachctrl>
> <ATT00001.txt.attachctrl>

______________________________________________________________________
Dit bericht kan informatie bevatten die niet voor u is bestemd. Indien u niet de geadresseerde bent of dit bericht abusievelijk aan u is toegezonden, wordt u verzocht dat aan de afzender te melden en het bericht te verwijderen. De Staat aanvaardt geen aansprakelijkheid voor schade, van welke aard ook, die verband houdt met risico's verbonden aan het electronisch verzenden van berichten.

This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. The State accepts no liability for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent in the electronic transmission of messages.