Desktop Organization

[Bob]

** Reply to message from Liam Proven <lproven at gmail.com> on Sun, 10 Aug 2014
16:38:19 +0200

> On 10 August 2014 15:53, Robert Heller <heller at deepsoft.com> wrote:
> > Yes on one level.  OTHO, I am not sure how well the Unity desktop is going to
> > be received by either *traditional* UNIX/Linux users OR ex-MS-Windows users.
> > *I* don't like it -- I have been using some form of UNIX/Linux for like 40
> > years.  (I don't partitularly like (Mac)OS-X either.)
> 
> 
> Well, that one will run and run. I like it a lot myself, and despite
> the switch, Ubuntu remains the #1 desktop/laptop distro. It's a
> simple, easy interface and it does everything I need.
> 
> And FWIW, I'm an old-timer too -- I've been using Windows since v2.0
> and Unix since SCO Xenix 2 on an IBM PC-AT.
> 
> But the Win95 desktop only came along in 1995. There was nothing else
> like it before then.

You are wrong here.  OS/2 version 2 was released in 1992.  Win95 looked a lot
like OS/2 v2 but software wise it was far behind OS/2.


> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/06/03/thank_microsoft_for_linux_desktop_fail/
> 
> So while I like the Win9x UI fine, I'm not wedded to it. I was using
> GUIs 6 or 7 years before it came out.

I never liked the windows gui probably because it was not consistent.


> If people want to choose something else -- something that is a rip-off
> of the Win95 interface -- they are free to do so, of course, and there
> are lots of distros to accomodate that. In the Ubuntu family, Lubuntu
> and Kubuntu look like Win9x out of the box, and Xubuntu can easily be
> made to.
> 
> Outside of the official remixes, there are Linux Mint with Cinnamon --
> another direct rip-off -- and Mint with Maté which, like XFCE, can be
> made to look Windows-like, plus Zorin OS, Peppermint Linux, and even
> arguably Bodhi Linux with Englightenment 17 which comes with several
> Windows-like layouts.
> 
> But I think there is a strong case to make for just trying the "real
> thing", the official standard Ubuntu, and seeing if the user can
> adapt. Suggesting adding multiple desktops to a single install is
> /not/ newbie-friendly!

I have used OS/2 since 1989 and it has been my primary os ever since.  Every 4
or 5 years I have tried some version of Linux.  Until Ubuntu none stayed on a
disk drive for more than a week or so.  If/when I find OS/2 can not keep up
with new hardware Ubuntu will be my next os.

-- 
Robert Blair