[OT] - Netflix

[NoOp]

Not sure why you are replying to Hunter with pokes at my responses.
You'd have been better off replying to my post instead.

In-Reply-To:
<CAJXz=1o+SY-+weXS2XYnzrttHsnNNXEgDLyZqTE+82Dv+TEKfw at mail.gmail.com>

That's not me.

Maybe it's the fact that you are using MS Outlook...
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0

On 09/13/2011 08:06 AM, compdoc wrote:
>>None of my systems use qemu-KVM

> So you know nothing about it. 

Actually I do. My chipsets don't support it. You do realize that
quem-KVM is a hardware base virtualization method... right? I (NoOp)
stated that I use VirtualBox and VMWare (Player) instead.

> 
>>Because I'm not sure just what you want explained.

I wrote that.

> 
>  
> 
> I was responding to NoOp, but you sound as though I was responding to you.
> Are you the same person? 

I am in this post, but the person you replied to (Hunter Poe) is not.

> You do sound a lot like NoOp - you say things without explaining them. If
> you don't use qemu-KVM then what do you use? And how is the video
> performance, and how much ram is required?

You can start here:
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/VirtualMachines
and here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_machine
  http://www.virtualbox.org/
  http://www.vmware.com/
   http://www.vmware.com/virtualization/what-is-virtualization.html
    http://www.vmware.com/products/player/overview.html

> Why not educate us rather than act like you're the only person who knows how
> it all works?

Because you stated "A windows virtual machine typically uses RDP or VNC
to view the desktop" indicating that you know how it all works. This
isn't a tutorial forum, and I don't mind helping (check my posting
history), but I do mind when advise is provided that is completely
incorrect. And then you reply:

> Surprised you didn't know - qemu-KVM uses VNC on the console, or you can
> access with RPD. I think Xen is similar. This is typical, as I said. I
> didn't say this was the only way.