ubuntu-users Digest, Vol 82, Issue 120
Yamileth María Jiménez García
yamibiblio at gmail.com
Sun Jun 19 20:29:37 UTC 2011
ninguna de la informcion enviada la he podido utilizar x q viene en ingles
2011/6/17 <ubuntu-users-request at lists.ubuntu.com>
> Send ubuntu-users mailing list submissions to
> ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> ubuntu-users-request at lists.ubuntu.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> ubuntu-users-owner at lists.ubuntu.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of ubuntu-users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: GRUB Section in 11.04 Preseed file (nikhil .)
> 2. Re: Ubuntu 10.04 Updates List (Oliver Grawert)
> 3. Re: Ubuntu 10.04 Updates List (Oliver Grawert)
> 4. Re: I post the link for slow 11.04 (Goh Lip)
> 5. Re: Reminderfox date select boxes too small (Colin Law)
> 6. Re: GRUB Section in 11.04 Preseed file (Marc Deslauriers)
> 7. Re: [SOLVED?] Re: under newer hand-rolled kernel, sound has
> gone away on ubuntu 11.04 (Rashkae)
> 8. Re: [SOLVED?] Re: under newer hand-rolled kernel, sound has
> gone away on ubuntu 11.04 (Robert P. J. Day)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:34:47 -0500
> From: "nikhil ." <nikhil.fakeaccount at gmail.com>
> To: ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> Subject: Re: GRUB Section in 11.04 Preseed file
> Message-ID: <BANLkTi=mWWVaWnxTZDiF1007de0NTV=Lgg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 15:23 -0500, nikhil . wrote:
> >* Hi Guys, *>* *>* In my company we use the Ubuntu alternate ISO to
> automate our Ubuntu*>* deployments on many hundreds of systems. I'm trying
> to test Ubuntu*>* 11.04 installs now and have gone past several issues in
> the preseed*>* file but I'm stuck with an error in GRUB install. *>* *>* In
> 11.04 x64 installer, I get a prompt for "Select location for*>* installing
> GRUB" and then I enter /dev/sda but this does not work. I*>* have tried
> /dev/sda1, /dev/sda3, /dev/sda5 (all are valid partitions).*>* My section in
> preseed file is *>* *>* d-i grub-installer/only_debian boolean false*>* d-i
> grub-installer/with_other_os boolean false*>* d-i grub-installer/bootdev
> string /dev/sda1*>* *>* What is strange is that the above section works
> for the 11.04 32-bit*>* installer without a problem. *>* *>* Has anyone
> seen this? Please help.*
> >>I think you need to specify the partition in a grub format, ie:
>
> >>d-i grub-installer/bootdev string (hd0)
>
> >>Marc.
>
>
> Hi Marc,
>
> In previous versions of Ubuntu the grub format (hd0,0) used to workl. In
> Ubuntu 11.04 x86, I encountered an error which went away after I changed
> the
> format to /dev/sda. But for x64 the error appears with both formats.
>
> thanks
> Nikhil
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20110617/c22050be/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:37:36 +0200
> From: Oliver Grawert <ogra at ubuntu.com>
> To: ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> Subject: Re: Ubuntu 10.04 Updates List
> Message-ID: <1308332256.18095.4.camel at osiris>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> hi,
> Am Freitag, den 17.06.2011, 12:08 -0400 schrieb Donald Talbert:
> > On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 17:13 +0200, Nils Kassube wrote:
> > > Esben Stien wrote:
> > > > Nils Kassube <kassube at gmx.net> writes:
> > > > > In synaptic mark all updates and then select "File" -> "Generate
> > > > > package download script".
> > > >
> > > > You didn't read my entire mail before you replied.
> > >
> > > Or maybe I didn't understand your intention, because I did read the
> mail
> > > completely before I replied. Anyway, sorry if that answer wasn't what
> > > you are looking for.
> > >
> > >
> > > Nils
> > >
> >
> > Close though, I'm also interested in how to do what the OP is asking. :)
> here is a one liner:
>
> for file in $(grep-dctrl -n -s Package -F Status "ok
> installed" /var/lib/dpkg/status|sort -u);do apt-cache show $file|grep
> Filename|sed -e 's/Filename: /http:\/\/archive.ubuntu.com\//';done
>
> ciao
> oli
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:47:13 +0200
> From: Oliver Grawert <ogra at ubuntu.com>
> To: ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> Subject: Re: Ubuntu 10.04 Updates List
> Message-ID: <1308332833.18095.8.camel at osiris>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> hi,
> Am Freitag, den 17.06.2011, 19:37 +0200 schrieb Oliver Grawert:
> > hi,
> > Am Freitag, den 17.06.2011, 12:08 -0400 schrieb Donald Talbert:
> > > On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 17:13 +0200, Nils Kassube wrote:
> > > > Esben Stien wrote:
> > > > > Nils Kassube <kassube at gmx.net> writes:
> > > > > > In synaptic mark all updates and then select "File" -> "Generate
> > > > > > package download script".
> > > > >
> > > > > You didn't read my entire mail before you replied.
> > > >
> > > > Or maybe I didn't understand your intention, because I did read the
> mail
> > > > completely before I replied. Anyway, sorry if that answer wasn't what
> > > > you are looking for.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Nils
> > > >
> > >
> > > Close though, I'm also interested in how to do what the OP is asking.
> :)
> > here is a one liner:
> >
> > for file in $(grep-dctrl -n -s Package -F Status "ok
> > installed" /var/lib/dpkg/status|sort -u);do apt-cache show $file|grep
> > Filename|sed -e 's/Filename: /http:\/\/archive.ubuntu.com\//';done
> >
> oops, i just read the OP mail again, the one liner above only gives you
> the wget'able urls of all installed packages of a system, so you would
> have to run it on 10.04.3 to actually get the difference between the two
> machines ...
>
> though it should be generally doable with some similar grep-dctrl
> command to get the package list of upgradeable packages.
>
> ciao
> oli
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 03:51:22 +0800
> From: Goh Lip <g.lip at gmx.com>
> To: ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> Subject: Re: I post the link for slow 11.04
> Message-ID: <4DFBB03A.2050508 at gmx.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> On 06/18/2011 01:11 AM, FireSam wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Goh Lip <g.lip at gmx.com
> > <mailto:g.lip at gmx.com>> wrote:
> >
> > On 05/22/2011 01:55 AM, William Biggs wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 2011-05-22 at 01:14 +0800, Goh Lip wrote:
> >
> > On 05/22/2011 12:39 AM, William Biggs wrote:
> >
> >
> > Is the 11.04 on the hard drive or on an external usb drive?
> >
> >
> > yes it is installed on the whole hard drive 11.04 is the only os
> >
> >
> > Asking this because there is an unresolved bug on slow boots from
> > external drive grubs (I am experiencing this too).
> >
> >
> > Is this still unresolved? I tried searching but did not find anything
> > about 11.04.
> >
> > Thanks. Sam.
> >
>
>
> Thanks for asking, Sam.
> The closest links I've got are
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/595448
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/576448
>
> I did not add to them as...
> [1] I use a much simplified grub.cfg from its own partition (applies to
> booting from usb too), ie not from an OS grub.
> [2] When booting to usb, it's always booting an iso file, not an
> installed OS.
> [3] The iso OS is a minimal ubuntu on e17 gui, not the normal
> gnome/unity/kde gui.
>
> Nevertheless, before replying to you, I tested by setting the 'normal'
> natty grub to mbr and use that to boot to the (minimal) iso file in the
> usb. Confirm that there is the 'lag' of about 45 secs when pressing
> 'enter' at (modified) menu till computer (lights) shows any activity.
> Total boot time is about 105 secs (e17 is fast, boot time wise, 20 secs).
>
> Further note I had wondered about the role the many partitions and
> externals play in this, but found that booting up the same usb in other
> (simpler setup) computers have the same lag, or slightly longer.
>
> Anyhow, it is not a 'show-stopper' and I do not want to make a fuss out
> of it (I'm not the OP). But thanks.
>
> Regards - Goh Lip
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:49:27 +0100
> From: Colin Law <clanlaw at googlemail.com>
> To: "Ubuntu user technical support, not for general discussions"
> <ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com>
> Subject: Re: Reminderfox date select boxes too small
> Message-ID: <BANLkTinwcWzGs7TU-GvcSKjp1PVq+jxoMQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> On 28 May 2011 21:21, Colin Law <clanlaw at googlemail.com> wrote:
> > On 28 May 2011 17:33, Jim Byrnes <jf_byrnes at comcast.net> wrote:
> >> On 05/28/2011 10:20 AM, Colin Law wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Is anyone else using Reminderfox in Ubuntu 11.04? ?Since I upgraded to
> >>> 11.04 the date select boxes in Add/Edit reminder dialog are too small
> >>> and only show one digit.
> >>> I am using Reminderfox 1.9.9.3.1 with Firefox 4.0.1
> >>>
> >>> If I want to report this should I do it against Firefox?
> >>>
> >>
> >> I just added it to Firefox 4.0.1, Ubuntu 11.04 on my Thinkpad and see
> the
> >> same thing. ?As to where to report it, I'm not sure, sorry.
> >
> > For reference I have submitted a bug:
> > https://www.mozdev.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24046
>
> For the record it appears this is actually a problem with Firefox
> itself (and the situation is also seen in Thunderbird). In Ubuntu
> 11.4 and Firefox 4.0.1 in Edit > Preferences > Content, for example,
> the select box for font size is too small to show the digits, but only
> when certain system themes are selected. The problem appears in the
> Ambiance and Clearlooks themes but not in Darkroom. I have submitted
> a bug (I expect it has already been reported but I can't find it).
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/798770
>
> Colin
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:04:28 -0400
> From: Marc Deslauriers <marcdeslauriers at videotron.ca>
> To: "Ubuntu user technical support, not for general discussions"
> <ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com>
> Subject: Re: GRUB Section in 11.04 Preseed file
> Message-ID: <1308341068.3014.14.camel at mdlinux>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 12:34 -0500, nikhil . wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 15:23 -0500, nikhil . wrote:
> > > Hi Guys,
> > >
> > > In my company we use the Ubuntu alternate ISO to automate our Ubuntu
> > > deployments on many hundreds of systems. I'm trying to test Ubuntu
> > > 11.04 installs now and have gone past several issues in the preseed
> > > file but I'm stuck with an error in GRUB install.
> > >
> > > In 11.04 x64 installer, I get a prompt for "Select location for
> > > installing GRUB" and then I enter /dev/sda but this does not work. I
> > > have tried /dev/sda1, /dev/sda3, /dev/sda5 (all are valid partitions).
> > > My section in preseed file is
> > >
> > > d-i grub-installer/only_debian boolean false
> > > d-i grub-installer/with_other_os boolean false
> > > d-i grub-installer/bootdev string /dev/sda1
> > >
> > > What is strange is that the above section works for the 11.04 32-bit
> > > installer without a problem.
> > >
> > > Has anyone seen this? Please help.
> >
> > >>I think you need to specify the partition in a grub format, ie:
> >
> > >>d-i grub-installer/bootdev string (hd0)
> >
> > >>Marc.
> >
> > Hi Marc,
> >
> > In previous versions of Ubuntu the grub format (hd0,0) used to workl.
> > In Ubuntu 11.04 x86, I encountered an error which went away after I
> > changed the format to /dev/sda. But for x64 the error appears with
> > both formats.
> >
>
> Ah, yes, it apparently changed to /dev/sda style strings in Natty. Sorry
> for the misinformation.
>
> What's the exact error message you are getting on amd64?
>
> Marc.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:59:24 -0400
> From: Rashkae <ubuntu at tigershaunt.com>
> To: "Ubuntu user technical support, not for general discussions"
> <ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com>
> Subject: Re: [SOLVED?] Re: under newer hand-rolled kernel, sound has
> gone away on ubuntu 11.04
> Message-ID: <4DFBDC4C.5000702 at tigershaunt.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> On 06/17/2011 12:13 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > so it would seem that there's my problem -- ACLs have not been set
> > properly on all of the /dev/snd/* files. but why not? a quick google
> > brings me here:
> >
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=593881
> >
> > which sure looks like what i'm fighting with. i just need to peruse
> > that page more carefully to figure out why this is happening and what
> > i need to do about it. in the meantime, i'm open to suggestions.
> >
>
> The ACL permissions are set with this script as part of udev:
>
> /lib/udev/rules.d/70-acl.rules
>
> However, if you don't really care about ACL permissions being
> dynamically added to the logged in user, you can simply add yourself
> (and any other user) to the audio group, reboot, and be done with.
>
> And... welcome, btw.
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:08:20 -0400 (EDT)
> From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday at crashcourse.ca>
> To: "Ubuntu user technical support, not for general discussions"
> <ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com>
> Subject: Re: [SOLVED?] Re: under newer hand-rolled kernel, sound has
> gone away on ubuntu 11.04
> Message-ID:
> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1106171905420.8043 at localhost6.localdomain6>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
>
> On Fri, 17 Jun 2011, Rashkae wrote:
>
> > On 06/17/2011 12:13 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > > so it would seem that there's my problem -- ACLs have not been set
> > > properly on all of the /dev/snd/* files. but why not? a quick google
> > > brings me here:
> > >
> > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=593881
> > >
> > > which sure looks like what i'm fighting with. i just need to peruse
> > > that page more carefully to figure out why this is happening and what
> > > i need to do about it. in the meantime, i'm open to suggestions.
> > >
> >
> > The ACL permissions are set with this script as part of udev:
> >
> > /lib/udev/rules.d/70-acl.rules
> >
> > However, if you don't really care about ACL permissions being dynamically
> > added to the logged in user, you can simply add yourself (and any other
> user)
> > to the audio group, reboot, and be done with.
> >
> > And... welcome, btw.
>
> nope, that wasn't the problem. the problem was that, mysteriously,
> as i was upgrading my kernel source to build a newer kernel, i somehow
> managed to *de*select the kernel config option TMPFS_POSIX_ACL, with
> predictably disastrous consequences.
>
> as soon as i isolated the problem, i simply re-selected that option,
> built a new kernel, and all was right with the world again. how i
> managed to lose that config setting is still a mystery.
>
> rday
>
> --
>
> ========================================================================
> Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
> http://crashcourse.ca
>
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
> LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
> ========================================================================
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> --
> ubuntu-users mailing list
> ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
>
>
> End of ubuntu-users Digest, Vol 82, Issue 120
> *********************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20110619/7f925ccc/attachment.html>
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list