Went Back To Windows(R)...
tom_a_sparks at yahoo.com.au
Sat Jul 30 08:09:51 UTC 2011
From: Steve Flynn <anothermindbomb at gmail.com>
>On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Tom Sparks <tom_a_sparks at yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>>I find Windows Vista/7 is hard to navigate then DOS/3.1/95/98/ME/XP
>>>(don't f*ck with things that work)
>Really? What aspect do you find more difficult?
my 10+ years of windows history, with a new interface
>I see you include Millennium Edition in that list, which really was dire but I find it hard to comprehend how >you can find Windows 7 "hard(er) to navigate" than DOS or 3.1.
with DOS, windows 3.1, amigaOS 3.1 you could put your programs (and their data files) where you wanted them, most of the time you would let the installer use the default location, unless you had another reason
in vista/7 you have a folders called "user" and "Document and settings"
the closest linux concept to "Document and settings" folder is the "home" folder
I still don't get why have a "user" folder, when the "document and settings" folder dose the same job
add in MS office 2010, then you start getting Where the f*ck is <insert program/file/option> ?
>That basically says that the hundreds of millions of man-hours poured into GUI development, design and >coding standards have been a complete waste for you, which is tragic.
the gui looks more like a piece of art, I would hang on a wall/in the bin
I'm shutting up, as this is not a windows bitching mailing list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ubuntu-users