No subject

[Tero Pesonen]

On Sat, 2011-08-13 at 17:37 -0500, Jordon Bedwell wrote:
> On 08/13/2011 05:22 PM, Tero Pesonen wrote:
> > You said saving bandwith was the entire justification for plain text; it
> > is not the justification for me, as my earlier reply explained. Nor is
> > to other users whom I know to prefer plaintext. So in case yours was
> > meant to be a universal statement, let me opine that that no, bandwith
> > restrictions are not the only justified reason to send plaintext.
> 
> I can't tell if this is the straw man playing with fire or if this is
> just plain trolling either way, just because I state it's the
> justification means it's obviously about /only me/?

OK, sorry. Obviously when oy wrote that the entire justification for
plaintext is bandwith restrictions, you of course meant that this is the
universal truth and not just your case. Well, as I said in my earlier
message, no, it is not the sole justification for plaintext and that
yes, there are other reasons as well for preferring plaintext. For me,
for instance, bandwith plays no role what so ever. 

So there you go. It is not the entire justification. It may be one
justification. 

OK? Is this difficult? I hope not.

Tero