No subject

[Jordon Bedwell]

On 08/13/2011 10:54 PM, Robert Holtzman wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 05:37:51PM -0500, Jordon Bedwell wrote:
>> On 08/13/2011 05:22 PM, Tero Pesonen wrote:
>>> You said saving bandwith was the entire justification for plain text; it
>>> is not the justification for me, as my earlier reply explained. Nor is
>>> to other users whom I know to prefer plaintext. So in case yours was
>>> meant to be a universal statement, let me opine that that no, bandwith
>>> restrictions are not the only justified reason to send plaintext.
>>
>> I can't tell if this is the straw man playing with fire or if this is
>> just plain trolling either way, just because I state it's the
>> justification means it's obviously about /only me/?
> 
> Not to start a war, but I interpreted it the same way Tero did. It did
> *not* seem to refer to you only.

If you interpreted it that way would that not mean you read it the way I
said it?  The ? indicates a question with satire mixed in, a bit of bad
satire I know but it's there and noticeable.  He interpreted the
opposite of what you indicate you interpreted it as.

I know I'm horrible at English but I can't be that bad can I?