gmail reply-to [was Nautilus]

[chris]

On Fri, 2011-04-22 at 21:23 +0100, Colin Law wrote:
> On 22 April 2011 19:42, Ric Moore <wayward4now at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-04-22 at 18:22 +0100, Colin Law wrote:
> >> On 22 April 2011 17:57, Cybe R. Wizard <cyber_wizard at mindspring.com> wrote:
> >> > On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 17:29:36 +0100
> >> > Colin Law <clanlaw at googlemail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On 22 April 2011 17:27, Colin Law <clanlaw at googlemail.com> wrote:
> >> >> > On 22 April 2011 17:07, Jim Byrnes <jf_byrnes at comcast.net> wrote:
> >> >> >> ...
> >> >> >> Most headers seem to have the group itself in the Reply To:. If
> >> >> >> you can't change that maybe logging in to your Ubuntu account and
> >> >> >> reviewing your subscription options may help.  At the very bottom
> >> >> >> of the list is Avoid duplicate copies of messages?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I have selected Yes for Avoid duplicate copies.  Can someone tell me
> >> >> > if it has made a difference?  I cannot see for myself of course.
> >> >>
> >> >> I have also now set Receive your own posts to the list to No.  The
> >> >> description of that sounds as if it may help.  Any difference in the
> >> >> Reply-To?
> >> >>
> >> >> Colion
> >> >>
> >> > It still shows:
> >> > Reply-To: clanlaw at googlemail.com, "Ubuntu user technical support,
> >> >          not for general discussions" <ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com>
> >> >
> >> > I fear you may be butting heads with a google-shaped brick wall.
> >>
> >> I have a theory, how is this?
> >
> > That worked!
> >                          Reply-to:
> > "Ubuntu user technical support, not
> > for general discussions"
> > <ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com>
> >
> > Congrats! What did you do?? Ric
> 
> In case anyone else has this problem, in gmail Settings > Accounts and
> Import > Send Mail As, click Edit Info.  In there is the option to
> provide what it says is a "different reply-to address".  Somehow I had
> enabled that feature, but put my normal gmail address in there (so not
> a "different" reply-to, just my normal one).  How that happened I have
> no idea.  It appears that caused my mail to be sent with reply-to set
> and I think mailman was interpreting the fact that I had supplied a
> reply-to to indicate that this should be passed on to list members
> along with the list address.  The solution was to clear the field for
> reply-to.
> 
> Many thanks to all for helping sort this out and apologies to Chris
> for falsely suggesting it was something to do with him.
> 
> Colin
> 

Accepted
cheers