thanks fedora

[Ric Moore]

On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 08:56 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:

> Huh? yum is multiarch capable and apt is, well, floundering on that 
> score at the moment. Nevermind the fact that dpkg don't check support 
> per file md5 checksums yet of which rpm does.
> 
> The server of two other schools were recently abused by some botnet 
> kiddie and had they been Ubuntu servers, I daresay it would have been a 
> real horror to verify what was compromised and was not. I just ran rpm 
> -Va and voila! I know certain important binaries were not compromised.
> 
> Becoming an apt fanboi based on ancient obsolete reasons ain't good for you.

I know one thing, when I switched I was floored by how much apt is
faster than yum. I don't see the dissension among repos either, like
Fedora is plagued with. Nor the "we don't do Sun" attitude. Jus my
two-cents worth. Ric


-- 
My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say:
"There are two Great Sins in the world...
..the Sin of Ignorance, and the Sin of Stupidity.
Only the former may be overcome." R.I.P. Dad.
Linux user# 44256