/boot filesystem

Ioannis Vranos cppdeveloper at ontelecoms.gr
Mon Nov 22 13:55:22 GMT 2010

On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 18:35 +0800, Goh Lip wrote:
> On Monday 22,November,2010 11:55 AM, Tom H wrote:
> > >
> > >Without any kernel, it will take about only 1 MB. Journaling would
> > > be a waste of resources.
> > >
> > It's not just a question of size. There are very few write operations
> > on "/boot".
> Good for clarifying. Of course, one can always use any supported format 
> he/she wishes, though ext2 is more than enough.

/boot partition "without any kernel" doesn't make sense (I am talking
about a default installation of /boot).

I do not think "very few write operations" is an argument too. And?

Why isn't ext4 used instead for example?

Ioannis Vranos


More information about the ubuntu-users mailing list