glgxg at sbcglobal.net
Fri Nov 12 04:36:02 UTC 2010
On 11/11/2010 08:24 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
> On Friday, November 12, 2010 11:55 AM, NoOp wrote:
>> On 11/11/2010 04:40 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
>>> On Friday, November 12, 2010 06:59 AM, NoOp wrote:
>>>> e100 works just fine for me. (Ubuntu from Dapper thru Maverick on 5
>>>> similar machines).
>>> Too bad there just as many reports of the various nics that do not work
>>> with e100. It appears to me it is usually those that say Pro/100 that do
>>> not work from what I find on complaints about e100 from quite a few
>>> years back...which is what Joshua has unfortunately.
>> I suppose. But with 19 individual threads on the issue it's hard to back
>> trace and do any realistic troubleshooting& I doubt anyone has the time
>> or inclination at this point.
>> You *really* need to fix your threading problem... this particular
>> thread was started by you Nov 10& I've already shown you the archives
>> with your other broken threads going back to 18 others. Perhaps you can
>> make amends by starting a new/clean thread with all the details? If not,
>> then I reckon that it's best that Joshua start a new thread (perhaps
>> 'E100 Driver WOCC'? (Without Christopher Chan)& hope you don't respond
>> until you get your treading issues sorted out :-)
> I believe that the threading issues were already sorted out? I removed
> the reply list addon already from my home box.
Your headers show that you were actually responding to a msg reference:
References: <E1PGP8e-0003C6-WD at chlorine.canonical.com>
In-Reply-To: <E1PGP8e-0003C6-WD at chlorine.canonical.com>
but for some reason the post is unthreaded. Don't know why, but the
archives show the same, so there still seems to be some issue on your end.
More information about the ubuntu-users