I successfully Restored Grub Boot-loader But It Doesn't Work.

[Basil Chupin]

On 02/11/2010 19:46, Tom H wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 4:27 AM, Basil Chupin<blchupin at iinet.net.au>  wrote:
>    
>> On 02/11/2010 18:41, Tom H wrote:
>>      
>>> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 2:08 AM, Basil Chupin<blchupin at iinet.net.au>    wrote:
>>>
>>>        
>>>> On 02/11/2010 16:36, Tom H wrote:
>>>>
>>>>          
>>>>> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 12:55 AM, Basil Chupin<blchupin at iinet.net.au>      wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>            
>>>>>> You have hijacked an existing thread dealing with, "Safely Remove Drive
>>>>>> needed twice".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please start your own thread -ie, post a new message - with the Subject
>>>>>> you chose for your message (above).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>              
>>>>> Why don't you just say "next time, please start your ow thread"?
>>>>>
>>>>>            
>>>> What exactly is the difference between what I wrote and what you claim I
>>>> should have written?
>>>>
>>>>          
>>> When someone top-posts, do you ask him/her to re-send the email or do
>>> you say "please don't top-post" (with an assumed "next time")?
>>>
>>>        
>> What the heck are you on about?!
>>
>> Please get real.
>>
>> Did you comprehend my reply to Stephen?
>>
>> Look, I am not in the mood to carry on with this nonsense. I've got
>> other more serious matters on my mind to deal with. If you want to take
>> it further then take it to private mail because I don't want to clutter
>> this list further with nonsensical rantings.
>>      
> I don't do private emails.
>
> I am suggesting that you tell the next poster who upsets your
> thread-hijacking principles (and list rules too, of course) to start a
> new thread the NEXT time

For chrissake! It is taken for granted that the the "NEXT" time is the 
bleeding obvious because the "now" has already happened! Right?

>   that he/she wants to start a thread rather
> than order them to start a new thread here and now (in the same way
> that you wouldn't ask a top-poster to re-post.)
>    

But there is one thing missing in your response above: the word "Please".

I used that work in my initial response.

But you are now telling me what to do - but you do not use the word 
"Please".

End of this thread. I am getting just a bit peeved off, OK?

No offence meant, nor any malice.

Pax.

BC

-- 
The sex was so good that even the neighbours had a cigarette.