Ubuntu or ubuntu-server edition?

Freddy Van Ingelgom freddyek at gmail.com
Sun Jun 20 15:37:37 UTC 2010

On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Freddy Van Ingelgom <freddyek at gmail.com>wrote:

> On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Hal Burgiss <hal at burgiss.net> wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Goh Lip <g.lip at gmx.com> wrote:
>> > Freddy, one important caveat. Most of us here are not on the server
>> > edition. If any of us here set up a 'server'. it is just for mucking
>> > around and may feel unqualified, including myself, to give you
>> > professional advice.
>> This is definitely not true. The signal to noise ratio is definitely
>> anemic, I'll grant you that much.
>> --
>> Hal
>> --
>> ubuntu-users mailing list
>> ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
> So far you all where very helpful. A few conclusions can already be taken:

   - A "regular" Ubuntu will use unnecessary  space with packages you do not
   need for a server application
   - You need to install separately things like Samba, and a lot of other
   things that will be "naturally" present in a server version
   - But basically there is nu difference between a "regular" Ubuntu and a
   server version, from a technical point view

I see forward to hear your thoughts about this.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20100620/7a8dab8d/attachment.html>

More information about the ubuntu-users mailing list