64-bit - Not recommended for daily desktop usage
johnneylee.rollins at gmail.com
Sat Jun 12 00:26:34 UTC 2010
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Manpreet Singh Dhillon
<mdwaps at gmail.com> wrote:
> In general using 64 Bit system has nothing to do with daily computing
> or daily desktop usage.
> Because a daily desktop user will rarely use applications which are
> not in 64 Bit architecture, and almost all other popular applications
> are already imported to 64 Bit architecture.
> I'm using 64 Bit versions of Ubuntu since 7.10 and I've never gotten
> into any problem, plus to utilize more than 3 GB RAM 64 bit OS is
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:48 PM, Knapp <magick.crow at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 6:17 PM, Colin Law <clanlaw at googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> On 10 June 2010 19:16, Ioannis Vranos <cppdeveloper at ontelecoms.gr> wrote:
>>>> Today, I came across this description for 64-bit Ubuntu, at Ubuntu's
>>>> "64-bit - Not recommended for daily desktop usage".
>>>> Why the 64-bit version is "not recommended for daily desktop usage"?
>>> Perhaps because 64 bit flash is no longer available from Adobe.
>> They cut it because of the cracker hole?
>> Adobe is a blight on open source and computing in general.
>> Douglas E Knapp
>> Creative Commons Film Group, Helping people make open source movies
>> with open source software!
>> Massagen Arbeit in Gelsenkirchen Buer
>> Please link to me and trade links with me!
>> Open Source Sci-Fi mmoRPG Game project.
>> ubuntu-users mailing list
>> ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
We've covered this a good <rather large number> times before.
Also don't top post. :)
> Regards: M S Dhillon
> ubuntu-users mailing list
> ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
More information about the ubuntu-users