64-bit - Not recommended for daily desktop usage
Manpreet Singh Dhillon
mdwaps at gmail.com
Sat Jun 12 00:20:17 UTC 2010
In general using 64 Bit system has nothing to do with daily computing
or daily desktop usage.
Because a daily desktop user will rarely use applications which are
not in 64 Bit architecture, and almost all other popular applications
are already imported to 64 Bit architecture.
I'm using 64 Bit versions of Ubuntu since 7.10 and I've never gotten
into any problem, plus to utilize more than 3 GB RAM 64 bit OS is
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:48 PM, Knapp <magick.crow at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 6:17 PM, Colin Law <clanlaw at googlemail.com> wrote:
>> On 10 June 2010 19:16, Ioannis Vranos <cppdeveloper at ontelecoms.gr> wrote:
>>> Today, I came across this description for 64-bit Ubuntu, at Ubuntu's
>>> "64-bit - Not recommended for daily desktop usage".
>>> Why the 64-bit version is "not recommended for daily desktop usage"?
>> Perhaps because 64 bit flash is no longer available from Adobe.
> They cut it because of the cracker hole?
> Adobe is a blight on open source and computing in general.
> Douglas E Knapp
> Creative Commons Film Group, Helping people make open source movies
> with open source software!
> Massagen Arbeit in Gelsenkirchen Buer
> Please link to me and trade links with me!
> Open Source Sci-Fi mmoRPG Game project.
> ubuntu-users mailing list
> ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
Regards: M S Dhillon
More information about the ubuntu-users