Grubb list menu

Karl F. Larsen klarsen1 at gmail.com
Sat Feb 6 13:13:20 UTC 2010


NoOp wrote:
> On 02/05/2010 07:38 PM, Goh Lip wrote:
>> On 02/06/2010 08:06 AM, NoOp wrote:
>>
>>> I should also add that this is a fault in the new startupmanager. I
>>> removed several older kernel images (-17 etc), and although it had been
>>> set to default to 'Windows 7 (loader) on /dev/sda1' (for my wife's
>>> convience as she's trying to figure out Win7 for her work), as soon as I
>>> ran 'sudo update-grub'&  rebooted, the default was set to
>>> vmlinuz-2.6.31-19-generic. I had to run startupmanager again to reset to
>>> Win7.
>>>
>>> I figure it will take a few months/revs to get all of this sorted out;
>>> grub2 may be the next gen... but IMO it's a PITA compared to grub.
>>>
>> Just making a short comment here, you'll still need to do this on 
>> grub-legacy if you want to default on windows. Still a PITA too. An 
>> alternative is to set default to saved. And yes, it's slightly more of a 
>> hassle to do that in grub2.
> 
> Actually not with startupmanager. With StartupManager on grub-legacy you
> simply set it to default (yes it has/had some hickups) you'd set it to
> default on the OS/Kernel and it pretty much worked. With old grub you
> also had the option to suppress the amount of kernels you'd see (the
> images were still present in /boot but you didn't have to look at them
> if you didn't want to.
> 
>> One way to avoid all this is to set up a separate 'main boot' or first 
>> boot partition to boot all OS. Any changes made in that grub.cfg will 
>> not be affected by any OS grub-update. Also it eliminates the need to go 
>> to each individual OS grub to update kernel changes in the other OS's.
> 
> Been there, done that. Found boot issues with missing kernals that were
> installed etc. Probably due to my not understanding all of the grub2
> structure (yet). But the issue remains that, as yet, grub2 is still a
> PITA to modify (may work well, but it's a PITA to modify - for me).
> 
>> But the main advantage is that for testing new OS or alpha's; where, by 
>> its very nature, is prone to errors or is 'unstable', you'll may end up 
>> with an unbootable system if this unstable OS is set to mbr and is 
>> nuked. Having a 'main boot' partition avoids this as it won't be nuked 
>> by any OS, even if that OS is nuked.
>>
>> Oh, it's always a good idea to keep a grub2 rescue disk handy. It was 
>> PITA to make a grub-legacy rescue disk
> 
> Try it with a floppy on karmic :-)
> 
>> , or setting a 'main boot' with 
>> grub-legacy and maintaining it. Or when the system cannot boot. Give me 
>> grub2 anytime.
> 
> I have supergrub rescue (not the base supergrub cd) and it works well
> with getting me booted and out of trouble (so far). Hopefully the
> maintainer of supergrub will get grub2 releases out soon - in the past
> he's done a great job with grub(legacy?).
> 
>> regards - goh lip
> 
> And I'll trust your grub/grub2 advise most anytime - thanks :-)
> 
> 
> 
	Where do you get the supergrub software? Since it is a two 
step process to change Grub2 I agree you need a special cd.

73 Karl



-- 

	Karl F. Larsen, AKA K5DI
	Linux User
	#450462   http://counter.li.org.
         Key ID = 3951B48D





More information about the ubuntu-users mailing list