basic - continued
Amedee Van Gasse
amedee-ubuntu at amedee.be
Sat Feb 6 16:50:16 UTC 2010
On 06-02-10 17:20, Chris Jones wrote:
>> No, it isn't. It is the comparison I, for example, had to do at
>> work: WinXP with Office 2003 or Ubuntu 9.04 with which ever version
>> of OOo I prefer.
> Nothing is stopping you buying a newer version of MS office...
His boss is stopping him, but I know what you are trying to say.
> If the point you are trying to make is OO is free, so you can upgrade
> whenever you want, whereas MS office isn't free, then great. A very
> fair and valid point. But on a purely technically level it is not
> fair to compare a 6 year old obsolete application to the latest and
> greatest of another, when an upgrade for the older package is
> available (free or otherwise).
> cheers Chris
Anyway, offtopic, so followup set to sounder.
Oh and Chris, could you check the wrapping in your email client? Your
last paragraph didn't wrap.
More information about the ubuntu-users