64 bit info

Karl F. Larsen klarsen1 at gmail.com
Wed Feb 3 21:04:54 UTC 2010


Hakan Koseoglu wrote:
> Karl,
> 
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Karl F. Larsen <klarsen1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Notice I have 2 GB of RAM and the 64bit 9.10 is using just
>> 1.45 GB of the RAM. I wasted $92 on new fast RAM which I was
>> assured you need
> 
> As far as I managed to follow the mailing list, no one insisted on you
> to go and purchase more RAM and no one knowledgeable stated that you
> need 4GB to run 64 bit. No one told you to go ahead and switch to 64
> bit.
> 
> 64 bit is useful above 4GB. Your PC's BIOS can have problems and you
> should not go over the supported amount of RAM. Some of these can be
> visible by problems above. Mind you, if you had Windows XP or Windows
> Vista or 7, if your motherboard won't let you use it, you won't be
> able to. The laptop I'm writing this mail has 4GB RAM but only 3.4 is
> visible to the OSes.
> 
> 64 bit can be useful below 4GB, there are some performance benefits
> and some performance losses. More, using special kernels you can use
> more than 4GB on 32 bit systems but no process can address such big
> chunks themselves and would be limited to 3.6GB each. On the other
> hand, unless you are running some big database server at your desk,
> this should not be relevant to you.
> 
>> 73 Karl
> Karl, this is what suprises me. Although you are an elderly gentleman,
> I do not believe this would prevent you from using modern operating
> systems. What suprises me is such a person who has managed to master
> such an interesting hobby refuses to investigate the issue in front of
> him and relies on and (insists generating) heresay and irrelevant
> chatter and gives occasional bad advice.
> 
> About 64 bit, I have two PCs & two laptops running 64 bit Ubuntu &
> Kubuntu with everything (DVD, flash, firefox, huge LCDs) running
> perfectly happily. I have a little netbook running 32 bit Ubuntu,
> again with all of the bells & whistles. Everything is as stable as
> they usually are with Ubuntu, some are better, some are worse.
> 
> Linux is about choice. Use whatever you want but please don't go
> around blaming people for own mistakes.
> 
> 73 Hakan (M1FCJ, M1/TA2MGW)
> 


	In no way do I blame anyone for ordering the big RAM chips. I 
got the opinion from several emails that you should have 4 GB 
of RAM before using 64bit. This I have said is not the case 
since the 64bit computer I write this on is running fine with 
2 GB of RAM. I have lots of money so the issue is not important.


73 Karl


-- 

	Karl F. Larsen, AKA K5DI
	Linux User
	#450462   http://counter.li.org.
         Key ID = 3951B48D





More information about the ubuntu-users mailing list