Interesting read about the future of Ubuntu

Billie Walsh bilwalsh at swbell.net
Sat Dec 25 15:24:06 UTC 2010


On 12/25/2010 09:12 AM, Avi Greenbury wrote:
> Robert Holtzman wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 04:06:18AM -0500, Ric Moore wrote:
>>> http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2010/12/22/unity_ubuntu_the_future/
>>>
>>> Killing off X11?? :) Ric
>> That's one of the reasons I'll be taking a long look at Debian Squeeze
>> when it's released as stable. I just don't like control freaks.
> Control freaks? Is it more control-freakish to dictate your use of
> Wayland than it was to dictate your use of X?
> X has a big bunch of problems, and it is a big old codebase. I don't
> know the ins and outs of the decision, but I really don't like this
> assumption that it must be a bad thing.
>
>
> Also, you may as well get Testing now, it's quite stable by most
> people's standards and it'll just become the official stable come
> Squeeze's release.
>

It's not all about whether X or Wayland is better or worse.

It IS all about change.

When the change over comes there will be a great wailing, tearing of 
clothing and gnashing of teeth. Things will be DIFFERENT. Not what 
everyone is used to.

How many messages a month do we see on the lists complaining that 
something is now in a different place. Or, how it's done has changed. 
The "I can't find *************. It used to be at *******" sort of message.

-- 
"A good moral character is the first essential in a man." George Washington

_ _...  ..._ _
_._  ._  .....  ._..  ...  .._





More information about the ubuntu-users mailing list