Is it just me, or is there a reason for it?

[ms]

On 14/08/10 17:06, R Kimber wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Aug 2010 10:25:57 +0200
> Amedee Van Gasse wrote:
>or the logcheck filtering should be tightened, but that users
> shouldn't have to get to grips with extended regular expressions.
>
> If there's a better way rather than using logcheck I'll look at it.
>
> Since I'm clearly in a minority of one, I'll not pursue this further.

I've never used logcheck, but it can make a lot of sense, indeed to 
desire tightened filtering.

(The puzzled answer many of us, including me, gave to your post is that 
it asked for *less* logging for start, which is a bad idea. Asking for 
log filtering in a log reading app makes a lot of sense instead)

Alas, I don't know how can you do it *without* regular expressions. What 
do you propose?

cheers,
m.