Is it just me, or is there a reason for it?

[Amedee Van Gasse]

Op 14-08-10 01:12, Tom H schreef:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 6:57 PM, C de-Avillez<hggdh2 at ubuntu.com>  wrote:
>> On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 16:33:46 +0100
>> R Kimber<richardkimber at btinternet.com>  wrote:
>>
>>> But I don't see that as the choice.  Rather, either remove the
>>> uninformative stuff altogether,
>>
>> Generically speaking my answer would be no. For the udev message: it
>> is pointing to a deprecated usage, that has to be adjusted. It is
>> important for this type of message to keep on being issued until the
>> changes are made. On the 'texpire'... I have no idea what this
>> programme does, so I will not comment.
>
> Just googled the texpire message.
>
> Aug 12 07:51:32 infinity texpire[31193]: texpire 1.11.7: use_atime is 1,
> verbosity level 0, debugmode 0
>
> It looks texpire is part of leafnode and the log is just the start of
> its "expire old articles" run using atime (which hopefully means
> "access time"...
>
> Here's a case where the log probably isn't verbose enough. Any sign of
> Leafnode in the entry?
>

Leafnode isn't installed by default. It's even a highly specialized 
piece of software (a usenet proxy) that very few newb users will ever 
install. Anyone experienced enough with Linux to know what leafnode is 
for, will probably also be able to write a few regexes.