Is it just me, or is there a reason for it?

[Tom H]

On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 6:57 PM, C de-Avillez <hggdh2 at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 16:33:46 +0100
> R Kimber <richardkimber at btinternet.com> wrote:
>
>> But I don't see that as the choice.  Rather, either remove the
>> uninformative stuff altogether,
>
> Generically speaking my answer would be no. For the udev message: it
> is pointing to a deprecated usage, that has to be adjusted. It is
> important for this type of message to keep on being issued until the
> changes are made. On the 'texpire'... I have no idea what this
> programme does, so I will not comment.

Just googled the texpire message.

Aug 12 07:51:32 infinity texpire[31193]: texpire 1.11.7: use_atime is 1,
verbosity level 0, debugmode 0

It looks texpire is part of leafnode and the log is just the start of
its "expire old articles" run using atime (which hopefully means
"access time"...

Here's a case where the log probably isn't verbose enough. Any sign of
Leafnode in the entry?