Is it just me, or is there a reason for it?

[Tom H]

On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 3:16 PM, R Kimber <richardkimber at btinternet.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 13:33:22 -0400
> Tom H wrote:
>
>> Furthermore, if for some silly reason, Ubuntu developers decided to
>> make logs less verbose, imagine the "fun" in getting someone to enable
>> verbose logging in order to give this list, for example, enough
>> information to help that person.
>
> Sorry I forgot to reply to this second bit.
>
> Of course not having the right information would be a nightmare, but I'm
> suggesting there's too much useless information. Can you explain what
> useful information is provided in the particular messages I
> quoted that would be necessary for the list to help users with problems?

I don't see what the problem is with these logs.

Aug 12 16:37:41 infinity udevd[494]: BUS= will be removed in a future udev
version, please use SUBSYSTEM= to match the event device, or SUBSYSTEMS= to
match a parent device, in /lib/udev/rules.d/52-nut-usbups.rules:6 Aug 12
16:38:33 infinity udevd[494]: last message repeated 3 times

The 52-nut-usbups.rules is using BUS which is deprecated and has been
replaced by SUBSYSTEM/SUBSYTEMS.

or

Aug 12 07:51:32 infinity texpire[31193]: texpire 1.11.7: use_atime is 1,
verbosity level 0, debugmode 0

No idea.

or

Aug 11 15:23:09 infinity kernel: [535510.617659] type=1503
audit(1281536589.896:95):  operation="open" pid=12141 parent=1
profile="/usr/bin/evince" requested_mask="r::" denied_mask="r::" fsuid=1000
ouid=1000 name="/media/zip/rwanda.doc"

AppArmor has prevented you from opening rwanda.doc with evince.