Ubuntu 10.04 LTS released

[Robert Spanjaard]

On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 19:32:17 -0700, Pastor JW wrote:

> On Thursday 29 April 2010 1:26:38 pm Ioannis Vranos wrote:
>> Myself would go with a clean install (I prefer clean installs than
>> upgrades).
> 
> Clean installs are way too windoze for me, I want a distro which can
> flawlessly upgrade and update itself without having to delete and
> reinstall all the time.

Sounds great, but my very first upgrade (from 5.10 to 6.06 IIRC) failed.
So now I've got two alternating partitions. 9.10 is in use on partition A, 
and 10.04 is installed on B.
If 10.04 works, I can easily migrate everything I want from A to B. When 
10.10 comes out, I can give it a try on A and migrate of B to A if I 
desire.
If 10.04 fails, I can still boot 9.10 from A and wait for 10.10 to give it 
another try on B.
I'll always have a working version of Ubuntu, no matter how much they
(or I) screw up.

-- 
Regards, Robert                                      http://www.arumes.com