Mac look alike?
Odd
iodine at runbox.no
Sat Nov 28 14:35:42 UTC 2009
Chris Jones wrote:
> On 28 Nov 2009, at 1:54pm, Odd wrote:
>
>> Chris Jones wrote:
>>>> Thats a lie. I can get a machine with just as high quality and
>>>> power as the mac mini for around $350 to $400 dollars.
>>>> Macbooks are of no more superior quality as a lot of PC based
>>>> laptops. Personally I would prefer a Dell laptop over a Macbook
>>>> any day.
>>> Its not a lie, its my opinion. You may disagree and that is fine.
>>> I wouldn't be so rude to call your opinion a lie so please give
>>> me the same courtesy.
>> Facts disagree with you:
>> http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/laptop-reliability-survey-asus-and-toshiba-win-hp-fails/
>>
>>
>>
>> There are three companies ahead of Apple.
>
> True, in that particular survey. I'm sure though that if you search
> hard enough you can find results that suggest any of the main brands
> are the best (*) ... Also, from a scientific point of view I would
> want an estimate of the errors on those numbers. I would suggest,
> within the accuracy of the survey you cannot tell apart results that
> different than less than say a few %.
Which means that Apple hw is no more reliable than the others.
> Also, if you read the comments there are suggestions that the source
> of the data for that particular survey are questionable.
That's a thin argument, if I ever saw one. Comments below an
article. Really? That's a better source of facts you think?
> I don't know how good the data for that survey is,
Well, it's certainly more reliable than your faith-based
opinions on Apple hw.
> but my point is randomly citing one survey found on the web is not a
> reliable way to prove a point.
Again, it's certainly more reliable than your faith-based
opinions on Apple hw. Which really is no different than
a religion if you think about it. Dismissing facts because
they don't vibe with your faith?
> My opinion is just that, my opinion based on owning various hardware
> over the years, and helping friends and colleagues with theirs.
And your personal opinion is based on far, far less data than
the data above.
> Based on that, and not random web surveys,
That's not a random "web survey" but actual numbers from
a large hw service provider.
> I think Apple machines are better put together than most others.
What you "think" is irrelevant in the face of real facts.
> http://www.macnn.com/articles/07/10/23/apple.tops.reliability/
I guess Apple hw quality has deteriorated a lot since 1997.
--
Odd
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list