9.10 is a black eye for Ubuntu

[Matt Brown]

NoOp wrote:
> On 11/06/2009 06:33 AM, Derek Broughton wrote:
>   
>> Nils Kassube wrote:
>>
>>     
>>> Derek Broughton wrote:
>>>       
>>>> thomas wrote:
>>>>         
>>>>> Ray, it is good that you had a trouble free experience.
>>>>>
>>>>> But, most of us did not.
>>>>>           
>>>> What a thoroughly ridiculous statement.  Even of the people who post
>>>> here - and the ones who post about the upgrade will generally be the
>>>> ones who have problems - there's no evidence that "most" of us had
>>>> trouble.
>>>>         
>>> I think it depends on the definition of "us". We (you and me and many
>>> others) are obviously not part of "us". :)
>>>       
>> You've hit the nail on the head.
>>
>> I realize how frustrating it is for the odd user when something breaks, but 
>> I maintain Ubuntu's record is vastly better than some other OSes (including 
>> most other Linux distros), and that Karmic's is at least as good as any of 
>> the last three releases.  For Kubuntu, it's the cleanest release since 2007.
>>     
>
> We are not alone... :-)
> http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/news/index.cfm?newsid=3204993
> October 28, 2009
> Windows 7 endless reboot woes continue
> Users still struggling to upgrade their PCs
> Gregg Keizer
>
>
>
>   
Not really what you want though right our OS is not as bad as Windows? 
That is like saying my Corvette on blocks is as fast as your yugo 
without and engine...
Open bugs let the devs fix.