9.10 is a black eye for Ubuntu

[thomas]

I did not start out with the first release of 9.04. I had read about
it in Ubuntu magazine (or similar) and believed the glowing
review.

So, as has been stated by those who know about the earlier version
it got better. This is good because the folks working on it might be
able to solve most of the major problems that I am encountering. I
hope that it won't be long. I became addicted to the on-line radio
and old radio shows that I listened to.

Thomas

Rashkae wrote:

9.04 was a disaster by comparison.  KDE updated to KDE4, before it was
ready by far, Amarok destroyed, god help you if you had an Intel graphic
chip and upgraded without taking the warning in release notes to heart..
Early adopters of ext4 having config files truncated to 0 bytes,
followed by a kernel that would lock up when you delete too many files
that wouldn't get patched for months; I could go on.

I love 9.04 personally, but subjectively, to say that 9.04 release was
'better' than 9.10 is a joke.