Invitation to connect on LinkedIn

[Chris]

On Tue, 3 Mar 2009 18:47:21 +0100
Nils Kassube <kassube at gmx.net> wrote:

> CLIFFORD ILKAY wrote:
> > So now you're becoming nitpicky and changing your story to justify
> > your aggression. Originally, you were saying that she was a spammer,
> 
> I think you are mixing up things. Yes, I said she is a spammer, and I 
> stand by that allegation. But the main complaint is the rudeness of 
> blaming the list for receiving her spam.
> 
> > it wouldn't have made one bit of difference if 
> > Canonical's servers don't care about SPF, assuming SPF worked the
> > way she thought it did. 
> 
> How do we know if Canonical's servers care about SPF? If her setup is 
> faulty anyway, it is a very lame excuse for blaming the wrong people.
> 
> > I think you owe Adele an apology or at the very 
> > least acknowledge that there was no intent to spam as you so
> > fervently alleged earlier in this thread.
> 
> I never said she sent it intentionally. In my first mail in this
> thread I wrote:
> 
> | We will receive more of that junk from linkedin when the next
> clueless | user authorizes them to send spam to everybody in their
> address book.
> 
> IMHO, "clueless" doesn't mean "intentional".
> 
> 
> Nils
> 

From http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/clueless

clueless, adjective
Totally uninformed about what is going on; not having even a clue from
which to infer what is occurring 

I think you nailed it correctly, Nils.


-- 
Best regards,

Chris

()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments

	"There's no place like 127.0.0.1"