OT: Unix or UNIX or unix
debiani386 at gmail.com
Thu Jun 11 22:57:01 UTC 2009
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Rashkae <ubuntu at tigershaunt.com> wrote:
> Steve Flynn wrote:
> > Windows pre-emptively multi-tasks. Has done since Windows 95,
> > certainly for native 32 bit applications. Can't comment on 16 bit as I
> > was coding exclusively for Amiga at that time, which most definitely
> > pre-emptively multi-tasked out of the box.
> That's what the literature says, and I admit, Windows tries, but it does
> a very very poor job. Windows does not handle cpu contention well *at
> all* if any process is demanding. There is just no comparison to
> Windows vs Unix/Linux multi-tasking at all.
> ubuntu-users mailing list
> ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
yes true...you really cant put processes in the background like you can in
Registered linux user #402,916 (registered since 2007)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ubuntu-users