Sites that require Internet Explorer

[Pete Holsberg]

Hal Burgiss has written on 2/5/2009 1:33 PM:
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Pete Holsberg <pjh42 at pobox.com> wrote:
>
>   
>> If you read my post, I said that I was ignoring websites where an individual
>> expressed an opinion.
>>     
>
> Sorry, I didn't see that.
>
>   
>> The results I reported on came from a supposedly reputable organization that
>> ran tests to identify bugs on three browsers.
>>
>>     
>
> "Supposedly reputable"? That covers a lot of ground. Some people would
> describe MS as "supposedly reputable" but their track record on a
> number of issues, including security is so lacking, I wouldn't trust
> them with anything important. And thats not because of anything thats
> happened "lately", its because of many years of laxness, poor
> performance and suspect behavior. Whether deliberately producing
> flawed products, or by accident, is not even an issue. Its just that
> there is a history there that would lead anyone knowledgeable who
> looks at the relevant issues critically to conclude they shouldn't be
> trusted. At least not in matters of importance. As always ... IMHO!
>   

It wasn't Microsoft! :-)