Sites that require Internet Explorer

[Hal Burgiss]

On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Pete Holsberg <pjh42 at pobox.com> wrote:

> If you read my post, I said that I was ignoring websites where an individual
> expressed an opinion.

Sorry, I didn't see that.

> The results I reported on came from a supposedly reputable organization that
> ran tests to identify bugs on three browsers.
>

"Supposedly reputable"? That covers a lot of ground. Some people would
describe MS as "supposedly reputable" but their track record on a
number of issues, including security is so lacking, I wouldn't trust
them with anything important. And thats not because of anything thats
happened "lately", its because of many years of laxness, poor
performance and suspect behavior. Whether deliberately producing
flawed products, or by accident, is not even an issue. Its just that
there is a history there that would lead anyone knowledgeable who
looks at the relevant issues critically to conclude they shouldn't be
trusted. At least not in matters of importance. As always ... IMHO!

-- 
Hal