MiB in gparted?
Matthew Flaschen
matthew.flaschen at gatech.edu
Tue Feb 10 20:01:55 UTC 2009
Dave Woyciesjes wrote:
>>> Feh. Still looks as sloppy as all hell.
>> It's not sloppy. It's compliant with IEC 60027-2, and bypasses a
>> longstanding ambiguity. What's sloppy is calling something a typo and a
>> bug, getting corrected, and still refusing to admit you were mistaken.
>
> Yes, you are correct in it being compliant. At which point did I refuse
> to admit I was mistaken?
The part where you said, "Feh. Still looks as sloppy as all hell." Or
am I supposed to interpret that as, "Oops. My bad. I guess GParted is
completely correct about this."
> Please enlighten me. Or maybe you didn't bother
> to read all of what I said.
Actually I did.
> Again, putting words in my email message. I never said I had one
> definitive source.
I didn't put any words anywhere. /You/ said, "there are enough that one
has to go somewhere else to ensure the validity if the info". /All/
sources should be independently validated, not just Wikipedia.
Matt Flaschen
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list